Re: Reluctantly daring, not frivolously foolhardy.

[ Reply ] [ The Indyfan Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by graml from 137.155.21.115 on February 22, 1999 at 11:55:04:

In Reply to: Reluctantly daring, not frivolously foolhardy. posted by Satipo on February 22, 1999 at 11:27:38:

: : : he is not one to take risk just to do it. i dont think he would just
: : bunjie jump for the hell of it, but to obtain an artifact of save the girl he would
: : not think twice.

:
: Yes, I agree. Indiana Jones is not the Pepsi-Max drinking, thrill-seeking, surfer-dude type. He is a normal guy who gets into abnormal situations through his relentless pursuit of rare artifacts. Whenever he engages in something dangerous, there is often an air of reluctance about him as well as determination. He has the devil's luck, but he won't put it to the test unless he really has to; which, unfortunately for him, is most of the time. No offence to Tessa, but I think that, rather than partake in so called 'Dangerous Sports', he would view them as unnecessary risk taking activities in forced and unrealistic contexts.

: Adios,

: Satipo

Hey. Indy a "role model" for archaeologists? By God, the things he did in the Well
of Souls could get him arrested. Indy was a great adventurer, but he was a sub-par
archaeologist at best. The novels, I think, did a good job of making
him seem more professional as a digger. Especially the MacGregor novels.
Just my two cents.
-graml


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup:

Name:    
E-Mail:  
Subject: 
Comments:

Optional:

Link URL:   
Link Title: 
Image URL:  


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Indyfan Forum ] [ FAQ ]