Re: Was Temple REALLY intended to be a PREquel?

Posted by Sad little Phoenix from 207.151.85.130 on February 23, 1999 at 20:03:08:

In Reply to: Re: Was Temple REALLY intended to be a PREquel? posted by Satipo on February 23, 1999 at 11:14:57:

: : We all know that it was set in 1935, a year prior to Raiders, but was this really intended or was it a mistake? Could it possibly be that the trilogy was to take place over three years--1936, 1937, and 1938, but they mislabeled the Temple of Doom as being prior to the events in Raiders?

Sure! First I was first born, then Prissy came, so I was second born, now you're
trying to tell me I'm 3rd born! I will NOT be demoted down to Isis or Lukas level!

Phoenix

PS. Sorry,....just a little too much into character...Who wants an explanation?

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup:

Name:    
E-Mail:  
Subject: 
Comments:

Link URL:   
Link Title: 
Image URL: