Re: Widescreen in a second, but you'd already know that (nm)

Posted by Neil S. Bulk from proxy-521.public.rwc.webtv.net on March 07, 1999 at 19:59:11:

In Reply to: Widescreen in a second, but you'd already know that (nm) posted by Indiana James (Lambert) on March 07, 1999 at 09:18:10:

: : Which version of movies do you IndyFans prefer. Widescreen or plain old Pan-and-scan? I would choose widescreen in a second. You say way more, and for movies like this (and Star Wars), you can spot tiny new details that makes the movie more rich and enhanced.

Wide screen all the way. The compositions don't make as much sense when half the picture is missing. Plus the action is tougher to follow when the edges of the frame are missing. Forunately, my LD's are wide screen. I was so happy when they came out almost 7 years ago (Raiders and Temple of Doom, anyway. Last Crusade had been out earlier). If you want them cheap, I'm sure ebay would have them. All you would need then is an LD player, which Im sure ebay also has inexpensivley.

The widescreen editions are highly recommended.

Neil

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup:

Name:    
E-Mail:  
Subject: 
Comments:

Link URL:   
Link Title: 
Image URL: