Indy didn't have a tatoo, why should his fans?

Posted by the Fiddler from cboi12p86.boi.micron.net on July 20, 1999 at 20:48:41:

In Reply to: Indy Tattoos posted by Andrea on July 20, 1999 at 19:24:02:

Personaly (nothing against Tessa) I think tatoos are stupid. Why put a permanent mark on your body, pay money for it, and then maybe have it removed later?

Indy didn't have a tatoo, why should any of us? Star Wars fans are too fanatical if they get tatoos. They should look at the Star Wars characters. Darth Maul is the only one who has had a tatoo so far, if somebody wants to copy his that is fine, but otherwise SW fans shouldn't get tatoos either.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup:

Name:    
E-Mail:  
Subject: 
Comments:

Link URL:   
Link Title: 
Image URL: