Or Charlie Sheen, or Michael J. Fox hehe(NM)

Posted by Short Round from 1Cust43.tnt8.fort-lauderdale.fl.da.uu.net on October 09, 1999 at 08:06:53:

In Reply to: Re: Does Indy have to be Harrison Ford? posted by What did you say? on October 09, 1999 at 07:00:47:

: : Considering Harrisons age at proposing filming, if it ever gets filmed, would be 63!!!! Even Sean Connery was'nt that old when he reprised his role of Bond. Maybe somebody else, say Brad Pitt(or whoever) could be able to fill the role. Indiana Jones is a great character and it could survive in the same way that the Bond francise has. Its not a too way out idea if you consider it. Update the actor. The possible problem then would be, do you keep a period piece by keeping it in the 30/40s or do you progressively update it as the audience ages. If it was a long term francise, by that method it would eventually reach the 60/70s. Indys look is classic and it wouldnt need to change in the same way too that Bond retains his look.

: that's not right. Harrison Ford is Indy, nuff said. Brad pitt? HAHAH don't make me laugh; why not just make Woody Allen Indiana Jones!

Follow Ups:

• it would eventually reach the 60/70s Graham 09:33:20 10/09/99 (4)
  • Indiana Jones wearing bell-bottoms?!? Yuck!!! :( (nm) Goodsport 09:58:02 10/09/99 (3)
    • Re: "Yeah, INDY!!" "Oh behave, Henry!!" Ulla 11:47:39 10/09/99 (2)
      • Actually they do hint the time in For Your Eyes Only. Short Round 10:32:59 10/10/99 (0)
      • Re: "Yeah, INDY!!" "Oh behave, Henry!!" Raada 20:09:40 10/09/99 (0)

Post a Followup:

Name:    
E-Mail:  
Subject: 
Comments:

Link URL:   
Link Title: 
Image URL: