Is a bad Indy 4 better than no Indy 4 at all?

Posted by Mola Ram from wemyssfolly.demon.co.uk on July 04, 1998 at 17:24:26:

In Reply to: Forum Poll: The end of Indy? posted by The Northlander on July 04, 1998 at 16:59:11:

Just curious to know whether people believe that having a bad sequel would
ruin the whole series..or whether it wouldn't make any difference.
Like...do people believe that the Batman series is ruined by 3 and 4, or whether
you can just ignore them.
The problem with Indy films is that it does affect the course of Indy's life...the actors
are generally all the same so you accept the films as one whole story. Does that make sense?
Anyway..if anyone understood the question...give us your thoughts.

Follow Ups:

• Depends what a "Bad Indy" is Jeff 01:15:51 7/05/98 (2)
  • Re: Depends what a "Bad Indy" is ericao 18:14:06 7/05/98 (1)
    • Last Crusade The Northlander 21:46:32 7/05/98 (0)
• Re: Is a bad Indy 4 better than no Indy 4 at all? Megara 01:14:58 7/05/98 (0)
• Good vs. Bad The Northlander 18:06:10 7/04/98 (4)
  • Re: Good vs. Bad Glark 01:10:05 7/05/98 (2)
    • Hey Glark! The Northlander 21:30:26 7/05/98 (1)
      • Re: Hey Glark! Glark 20:49:12 7/07/98 (0)
  • Re: Good vs. Bad Phoenix 18:11:58 7/04/98 (0)

Post a Followup:

Name:    
E-Mail:  
Subject: 
Comments:

Link URL:   
Link Title: 
Image URL: