Re: Is a bad Indy 4 better than no Indy 4 at all?

Posted by Megara from spider-tn063.proxy.aol.com on July 05, 1998 at 01:14:58:

In Reply to: Is a bad Indy 4 better than no Indy 4 at all? posted by Mola Ram on July 04, 1998 at 17:24:26:

: Just curious to know whether people believe that having a bad sequel would
: ruin the whole series..or whether it wouldn't make any difference.
: Like...do people believe that the Batman series is ruined by 3 and 4, or whether
: you can just ignore them.
: The problem with Indy films is that it does affect the course of Indy's life...the actors
: are generally all the same so you accept the films as one whole story. Does that make sense?
: Anyway..if anyone understood the question...give us your thoughts.

Mola Ram,
I totally think that a "bad" Indy four would ruin the whole trilogy. The Indy trilogy, is one of the best, because, many people enjoy all three films. I would rather them not make one, then make one, but it looks like they are :( I just hope they do a great job! I also think it should end with this one, for Harrison Ford is Indy, and I, along with others would like to keep it that way.

~Meg~

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup:

Name:    
E-Mail:  
Subject: 
Comments:

Link URL:   
Link Title: 
Image URL: