No, no, of course not...

Posted by Cueball from 1Cust135.tnt1.brunswick.ga.da.uu.net on September 20, 2000 at 17:12:21:

In Reply to: you know a disturbing amount of information on this material,you must have worked with it before yes??? :)(nm) posted by Kenneth. on September 20, 2000 at 16:59:00:

It's just that in a scholarly discussion such as this, academicians such as myself deal in "theories". This is a THEORY. I dare gram-one to prove me wrong. Got a scanner, gram1-boy?

Sophisticatedly yours,
Cueball

Follow Ups:

• Pah! A likley story... Kenneth. 17:21:34 9/20/2000 (8)
  • Are you saying gram1 is a loose harlot? Cueball 19:04:43 9/20/2000 (7)
    • I can always count on you, pal! graml 19:36:19 9/20/2000 (6)
      • Stormflaps----good one.... Cueball 19:58:23 9/20/2000 (5)
        • You bet I do! graml 20:00:14 9/20/2000 (4)
          • Wow! This is the longest string in many a MOON!!!(nm) Dakota Ellison 22:45:26 9/20/2000 (3)
            • Thank gram-one's buttocks. (nm) Cueball 22:58:44 9/20/2000 (2)
              • What's next? A string of posts about graml's p-- bud-arc 23:45:01 9/20/2000 (1)
                • Doesn't have one of those, either. (nm) Cueball 06:12:12 9/21/2000 (0)

Post a Followup:

Name:    
E-Mail:  
Subject: 
Comments:

Link URL:   
Link Title: 
Image URL: