Hmmm...I don't think so...(nim)

Posted by bud-arc from ts027d16.sto-ca.concentric.net on March 13, 2001 at 02:36:21:

In Reply to: The difference between NIM and nim! (nim) posted by Fall Guy on March 13, 2001 at 01:14:10:

I basically figured that "nim" stood for the singular form of the all-important "non-important message," while NIM is the collective term for the nim as a whole. For example, "the NIM Rebellion (collective whole) writes lots of nims (singular, non-possessive)." Does that make sense? I just made it up on the spot. Not bad, eh?

P.S. Indiana Jones was our inspiration for nims. I'd like to take this moment to thank him.

Follow Ups:

• You're saying, NIM is the phenomenon while nim is it's spawn? (nim) Fall Guy 02:56:47 3/13/2001 (2)
  • Uh, yeah...something like that! (nm) bud-arc 03:10:15 3/13/2001 (1)
    • Uh... I think you're forgetting a very important historical figure here guys... The Big Red 17:55:31 3/13/2001 (0)

Post a Followup:

Name:    
E-Mail:  
Subject: 
Comments:

Link URL:   
Link Title: 
Image URL: