Following your logic, where is the the outcry for external safties on revolvers?(nm)

Posted by Dr.Brody from spider-tk081.proxy.aol.com on March 28, 2001 at 23:10:27:

In Reply to: Re: The boots have more metal than those plastic Glocks. :P posted by Curious on March 28, 2001 at 15:59:19:

: Yes, but not by much! As a matter of law, a "firearm" by legal definition, is the frame or receiver. You can take all the metal parts off a Glock and give them to a convicted felon and it would be legal--they're just parts. But you cannot give a felon the plastic frame (and polymer is plastic) because *that* is the firearm. A Glock, therefore, is a plastic gun (though it has metal parts). It's interesting that they have that little metal or aluminum insert for the serial number. I don't dispute that they shoot very well, but they have no history, no class (my opinion only) and no safety features to speak of. But that last part is a matter for another discussion.

: : : : Sorry, but as a three time certified Glock armorer, there is more steel in the Glock than in the Alden's. Regards, Dr.Brody

Follow Ups:

• Re: Following your logic, where is the the outcry for external safties on revolvers?(nm) Curious 06:12:07 3/29/2001 (4)
  • Re: Following your logic, where is the the outcry for external safties on revolvers?(nm) Dr.Brody 12:51:55 3/29/2001 (3)
    • Glocks, safeties and the lack thereof. Curious 17:58:24 3/29/2001 (2)
      • Re: Glocks, safeties and the lack thereof. Dr.Brody 05:14:01 3/30/2001 (1)
        • Bottom line? Michaelson 12:06:10 4/01/2001 (0)

Post a Followup:

Name:    
E-Mail:  
Subject: 
Comments:

Link URL:   
Link Title: 
Image URL: