PG or PG-13? But not R.

Posted by The Grey Wanderer from ppp-207-193-28-146.snantx.swbell.net on October 20, 1998 at 20:44:51:

I don't think anyone wants to see Indy IV with an R rating. R denotes language, sex, and extreme violence, the first two of which are hardly seen in the Indy movies. Although nowadays we can have two "f***"s in a movie and still rank a PG-13. Anyway, if they keep the violence to the other movies' levels, where we just see punches and (cool!) stunts and more punches, minimal blood, a few gunshots, they'll be OK. Language doesn't need to go past "godd***" or even "s***". No sex; hints, OK, but no barechested ladies or stuff. In fact, if they can deliver a kick-ass PG movie, that equals/outdoes (can it be outdone?) Raiders, they'll have accomplished something rare. Realistically, it'll probably be PG-13.

What do you guys/gals think?

-The Grey Wanderer

Follow Ups:

• Re: PG or PG-13? But not R. Brian W 16:18:27 10/21/98 (0)
• Re: PG or PG-13? But not R. Rob Davies 22:46:48 10/20/98 (1)
  • Re: PG or not PG? That is the qusetion. ~The Raider~ 05:33:41 10/21/98 (0)
• Re: PG or PG-13? But not R. ~The Raider~ 20:53:25 10/20/98 (0)

Post a Followup:

Name:    
E-Mail:  
Subject: 
Comments:

Link URL:   
Link Title: 
Image URL: