So you weren't concern when Indiana Jack was being obsessed?

Posted by Jay from spider-wa042.proxy.aol.com on May 13, 2001 at 12:10:15:

In Reply to: I disagree... posted by Micah on May 13, 2001 at 11:56:04:

Isn't a parody of Indiana Jones considered "All things Indy"? Yet, you suggested it be moved to another forum, becuase a couple people didn't like it.

Follow Ups:

• You just.... don't get it, do you? Sir Richard 14:42:49 5/13/2001 (2)
  • Fucck you asshole! Micah 21:24:27 5/17/2001 (0)
  • Re: You just.... don't get it, do you? Indiana [Insert name here] 17:01:50 5/13/2001 (0)
• Tired example... Micah 12:51:15 5/13/2001 (7)
  • So, you must understand how posts about shoe lace measurements and belt strap leather can be tiresome. Jay 13:23:35 5/13/2001 (6)
    • So don't read 'em, Petition Boy. You idiot. 13:30:13 5/13/2001 (0)
    • Grow up Jay. You're so immature.(nm) Sir Richard 13:29:54 5/13/2001 (4)
      • Yeah, and this is mature!(NM) Shorty 14:16:20 5/13/2001 (1)
        • F*UCK YOU! Sir Richard 14:43:59 5/13/2001 (0)
      • No, what's immature is the Gearheads calling me "moron" and "idiot" when I try to make a valid opinion. Jay 13:49:43 5/13/2001 (1)
        • AND F*UCK YOU TOO!!!!!! A concerned citzen 14:44:55 5/13/2001 (0)
• Indy Jack has absolutely nothing to do with Indiana Jones! My God! Sir Richard 12:37:58 5/13/2001 (2)
  • And neither does buttons!(NM) Shorty 14:17:50 5/13/2001 (1)
    • They're Indy's buttons. Indy Jack has nothing to do with Indiana Jones Sir Richard 14:47:33 5/13/2001 (0)

Post a Followup:

Name:    
E-Mail:  
Subject: 
Comments:

Link URL:   
Link Title: 
Image URL: