is anyone bothered by historical misinformation?

[ Reply ] [ The Indyfan Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Sluggo from 1Cust127.tnt1.vacaville.ca.da.uu.net on June 17, 2001 at 04:46:01:

tomb raider was starting to piss me off. the first shot of the cambodian ruins closely resembled Angkor Wat. Yet in closer shots, the ruins were decorated with smiling faces emerging from the stones. These charicteristics were not in Angkor Wat!!! If i'm not mistaken, the first site found where faces are present is Ta Phrom, a larger but lesser known temple complex north of Angkor Wat. sorry, it sounds a little petty, but sometimes things like this really piss me off. (btw, if im wrong please correct me. it could have another temple complex that first used faces instead of ta prohm. these names escape me)

and the biggest thing was this: that clock was supposed to be 5,000 years old, and the oldest parts of Angkor are only around 1,000 years old!!! uuugh!


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup:

Name:    
E-Mail:  
Subject: 
Comments:

Optional:

Link URL:   
Link Title: 
Image URL:  


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Indyfan Forum ] [ FAQ ]