Indy was in his 30's at the time of the trilogy

Posted by Marhala Bartender from 63.164.212.41 on August 08, 2001 at 11:19:00:

In Reply to: Something you need to understand posted by Clay on August 07, 2001 at 21:08:20:

In a way it would be nice to see a continuation of the series, but I think I would prefer to have it end with Harrison. This isn't like Bond, who is a timeless character. Indy is set in the 1930s and can't be thrown around in time as the Bond character is. If they were to do an Indy Jr. or something like that (which I certainly don't recommend) then they could get around the time constraint. However, it would be a grave mistake in my opinion to place another actor as Indy in roughly the same time period as the original three films take place in.

The Barkeep.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup:

Name:    
E-Mail:  
Subject: 
Comments:

Link URL:   
Link Title: 
Image URL: