That concept is perverse. ;) However, ...

Posted by Fall Guy from pool0863.cvx7-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net on August 13, 2001 at 20:34:30:

In Reply to: Here's a fanciful, stupid question that has no bearing on anything. posted by Rundquist on August 13, 2001 at 20:14:02:

... I'm afraid I'd have to go with SW. I want to see that story finished.
As for Indy, we got three movies, one of them is great, but all can stand on their own (So can Star Wars Episode IV).
The Indy movies don't rely on a continuing story. What's the same is the concept, some characters, running gags. That's about it. We don't really have any unfinished business left.
FG
PS: George will never give up SW (Or Howard The Duck Returns)in favor of Indy! ;)

: Would you guys give up the next 2 Star Wars movies if it meant
: Indy 4 would be made? By give up, I don't mean postpone. I
: mean lose forever. This idea came about when I was thinking
: about the Indy godhead (Lucas, Spielberg, and Ford) and who
: had the worst schedule. Cheers

: xxxxxxxxx
:
:

Follow Ups:

• If they kill off Jar Jar Binks in a really horrible manner, I might reconsider...(nm) Patterson 00:42:58 8/14/2001 (2)
  • Find the 'Anti Jar-Jar Cut' or 'The Phantom Edit' version of the film; it's a much better version! (nm) Indiana Banzai 11:26:24 8/14/2001 (0)
  • Isn't that a given? ;) (nm) Fall Guy 01:37:51 8/14/2001 (0)

Post a Followup:

Name:    
E-Mail:  
Subject: 
Comments:

Link URL:   
Link Title: 
Image URL: