Re: Uh, no....

Posted by Calixar from 64-40-54-113.nocharge.com (64.40.54.113) on Saturday, December 01, 2001 at 11:47pm :

In Reply to: Re: Uh, no.... posted by Anejo Joe from mlknfrw1.milliken.com (169.146.191.10) on Friday, November 30, 2001 at 5:42pm :

: Hancock's first book was good. The rest have been of somewhat lesser quality. I read the Cornuke book. My statement stands.

You're entitled to your own opinion.
I've not read Cornuke's books, but I've spoken to him and heard him speak on a number of occassions, and he's not half a kooky as Chariots of the Gods.

Sterling and Harrow - A Blatant Indy Ripoff! Follow Ups: Post a Followup Name: E-Mail: ( default ) Subject: Message: : : Hancock's first book was good. The rest have been of somewhat lesser quality. I read the Cornuke book. My statement stands. : You're entitled to your own opinion. : I've not read Cornuke's books, but I've spoken to him and heard him speak on a number of occassions, and he's not half a kooky as <i>Chariots of the Gods.</i> Optional Link ( default ) URL: Title: Optional Image Link ( default ) URL: This board is powered by the Mr. Fong Device from Cyberarmy.com