Heavy sigh...

Posted by Patterson from ? (66.123.147.146) on Thursday, October 10, 2002 at 3:32pm :

In Reply to: As long as they dont do the Mummy Returns thing ugh! nt posted by Masterfulks from ? (65.169.177.98) on Monday, October 07, 2002 at 4:37pm :

It is what it is. Some film makers seem to make better use of it while others do not. Par for the course with ANY aspect of film making. It's all about telling a story, and the less you have to think about the technical crap behind the scenes the better - IMHO. Given Spiderman was based on a comic book, I'm a lot less likely to harp on CGI use in telling that story. I mean, it is SUPPOSED to be a bit cartoonish, right?

About the only movie I really have a gripe with was Phantom Menace - and CGI was only one bone of contention. Jar-Jar ought to be reason enough to bring old George up on charges of crimes against humanity! (grin)

Hey - at least we're not seeing iguanas with sails glued to their backs anymore.

IMHO...

Indy Gear Follow Ups: Ah, good ol' TPM... - JuggleEwok 5:42pm 10/10/2002 Post a Followup Name: E-Mail: ( default ) Subject: Message: : It is what it is. Some film makers seem to make better use of it while others do not. Par for the course with ANY aspect of film making. It's all about telling a story, and the less you have to think about the technical crap behind the scenes the better - IMHO. Given Spiderman was based on a comic book, I'm a lot less likely to harp on CGI use in telling that story. I mean, it is SUPPOSED to be a bit cartoonish, right? : About the only movie I really have a gripe with was Phantom Menace - and CGI was only one bone of contention. Jar-Jar ought to be reason enough to bring old George up on charges of crimes against humanity! (grin) : Hey - at least we're not seeing iguanas with sails glued to their backs anymore. : IMHO... Optional Link ( default ) URL: Title: Optional Image Link ( default ) URL: This board is powered by the Mr. Fong Device from Cyberarmy.com