Indy isnt a digital world....

Posted by Masterfulks from ? (65.169.177.161) on Thursday, December 12, 2002 at 11:35pm :

In Reply to: The digital war. posted by Rundquist from adsl-63-201-187-189.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net (63.201.187.189) on Wednesday, December 11, 2002 at 5:18pm :

I'm ok with shooting in digital, as long as he's not doing it to make cgi easier. Because CGI has no place in Indy!

I dont want to see Indy running away from a CGI ball because it was easier than making one in the prop department.

I understand that some things like the cities in Starwars sorta have to be digital if you want to show them. However, I see nothing in the Indy world that requires CGI.

Digital is great for getting things to transfer well to DVD though....

So I guess what I'm saying is film in whatever you want, just keep the movie as real as possible......

Follow Ups: Too late. - JuggleEwok 3:06pm 12/13/2002 Blimp? - Brett Maverick Lambert 7:31pm 12/13/2002 Hardy har har. - JuggleEwok 6:12pm 12/14/2002 Post a Followup Name: E-Mail: ( default ) Subject: Message: : I'm ok with shooting in digital, as long as he's not doing it to make cgi easier. Because CGI has no place in Indy! : I dont want to see Indy running away from a CGI ball because it was easier than making one in the prop department. : I understand that some things like the cities in Starwars sorta have to be digital if you want to show them. However, I see nothing in the Indy world that requires CGI. : Digital is great for getting things to transfer well to DVD though.... : So I guess what I'm saying is film in whatever you want, just keep the movie as real as possible...... Optional Link ( default ) URL: Title: Optional Image Link ( default ) URL: This board is powered by the Mr. Fong Device from Cyberarmy.com