Re: LETS NOT BE REDICULIOUS....

[ Reply ] [ The Indyfan Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by INDIANA G.J.R. from spider-te082.proxy.aol.com on January 23, 1999 at 11:23:53:

In Reply to: More Opinions posted by Mark on January 23, 1999 at 01:46:43:


: : tEMPLE OF DOOM BELIEVABLE??? HAH HA THATS A LAUGH- Tell you what jump out a plane in a life raft and if you live, then i will say all of TOD is believable.

: That's true, but I still loved that part, very Spielberg. To me it seems like the differences(or feel)of the three movies reflected on who seemed to be in charge. Raiders was Lucas' baby, Temple seemed to be a pure Spielberg action flick, and Crusade appeared to be more of a collaboration of the two. After seeing several movies by both, this just seems a pretty good assumption in my opinion. Anyone else think so??

: Mark

You have to be kidding me to say that Temple of Doom is most beleivable. As for Indy 4 you are totally wrong. Since when has age stopped anyone in hollywood. I, myself are not influenced by the webs many rumors. I beleive only from the horses mouth! All three Indys i take to heart.
P.S.( If your a true Temple of Doom fan, you will learn that Ford was apperently rushed into costume, making the movie a little less then it was supposed to be.)
Take Care,
G.J.R.


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup:

Name:    
E-Mail:  
Subject: 
Comments:

Optional:

Link URL:   
Link Title: 
Image URL:  


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Indyfan Forum ] [ FAQ ]