If they kill off Jar Jar Binks in a really horrible manner, I might reconsider...(nm)

Posted by Patterson from AC939E6B.ipt.aol.com on August 14, 2001 at 00:42:58:

In Reply to: That concept is perverse. ;) However, ... posted by Fall Guy on August 13, 2001 at 20:34:30:

: ... I'm afraid I'd have to go with SW. I want to see that story finished.
: As for Indy, we got three movies, one of them is great, but all can stand on their own (So can Star Wars Episode IV).
: The Indy movies don't rely on a continuing story. What's the same is the concept, some characters, running gags. That's about it. We don't really have any unfinished business left.
: FG
: PS: George will never give up SW (Or Howard The Duck Returns)in favor of Indy! ;)

:

: : Would you guys give up the next 2 Star Wars movies if it meant
: : Indy 4 would be made? By give up, I don't mean postpone. I
: : mean lose forever. This idea came about when I was thinking
: : about the Indy godhead (Lucas, Spielberg, and Ford) and who
: : had the worst schedule. Cheers

: : xxxxxxxxx
: :
: :

Follow Ups:

• Find the 'Anti Jar-Jar Cut' or 'The Phantom Edit' version of the film; it's a much better version! (nm) Indiana Banzai 11:26:24 8/14/2001 (0)
• Isn't that a given? ;) (nm) Fall Guy 01:37:51 8/14/2001 (0)

Post a Followup:

Name:    
E-Mail:  
Subject: 
Comments:

Link URL:   
Link Title: 
Image URL: