Re: why is Temple of Doom a Prequel?

Posted by ROB T. from 162.10.138.28 on July 21, 1999 at 22:31:23:

In Reply to: why is Temple of Doom a Prequel? posted by Mike on July 21, 1999 at 21:22:07:

We tried to answer this a couple of weeks ago but didn't really come to a solution. Some of the reasons suggested were to explain the absence of Marion. Or to explain the absence of the Nazis. Or maybe just to keep any of the events from "Raiders" from interfering with the plot of "Temple of Doom."
I personally think it was an arbitrary decision and wasn't really meant to serve any real purpose. I doubt that Lucas or Spielberg would consider "Temple of Doom" to be a prequel per se. Not in the way that "Phantom Menace" is a prequel to "Star Wars."
They may even have thought that nobody would really notice.

Follow Ups:

• Re: why is Temple of Doom a Prequel? Sean 06:01:03 7/22/99 (2)
  • Re: why is Temple of Doom a Prequel? California Jones 15:17:59 7/22/99 (1)
    • Re: why is Temple of Doom a Prequel? Greg 09:53:21 7/23/99 (0)

Post a Followup:

Name:    
E-Mail:  
Subject: 
Comments:

Link URL:   
Link Title: 
Image URL: