OK...waitaminute...

[ Reply ] [ Indyfan Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Jimmie from evrtwa1-ar8-4-65-020-184.evrtwa1.dsl-verizon.net (4.65.20.184) on Monday, May 20, 2002 at 5:16pm :

In Reply to: Just check the credits for "Donovan's Digital Compositing" posted by Forrestal from 66-106-175-34.customer.algx.net (66.106.175.34) on Monday, May 20, 2002 at 3:21pm :

: The moving Zeppelin and the spinning prop on the Pilatus were also done with CGI, and the rotating blades in the temple look also like CGI.

ok,I concur, for now, with the propellor (as the camera trucks in THROUGH it) and the spinning blades (forgot about those - they DID look CG)...the zeppelin seems to have the 'glowing' edges around it visible with a model against a blue screen.Perhaps it was a mixture of the two. However, I think you might be reading too much into the "Donovan's Digital Compositing".....

I STILL think that the head was stop-motion, but perhaps, as the words DIGITAL COMPOSITING suggest, it was COMPOSITED (I.E. Inserted into the existing 'plate') using digital techniques, INSTEAD of using a blue screen...so instead of making the usual requisite BG plate, interpositive, etc, they simply digitally INSERTED (or 'laid-over', if you will) the pre-existing stop-motion shot of D's head decaying, Thereby cutting down on the number of film components needed for the shot. Our more film-knowledgable folks about could clarify as to whether this would be cheaper or not...?
I could buy that it was INSERTED digitally...but the head itself was S-M....hmmmm...this is a sticky one, yeah?

Good discussion, though!!

Jimmie




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail: ( default )
Subject:
Message:
Optional Link ( default )
URL:
Title:
Optional Image Link ( default )
URL:


This board is powered by the Mr. Fong Device from Cyberarmy.com